Independent report
SHANGLA: Allegations of favouritism, political influence and possible financial irregularities have raised questions about the transparency of the ongoing anti-encroachment operation in Shangla, with citizens demanding an impartial investigation into the implementation of the drive.
Residents have alleged that some influential individuals and property owners are being given opportunities to protect their buildings and commercial properties, while shops, houses, platforms, boundary walls and other structures belonging to ordinary citizens are being demolished without similar consideration.
Complaints circulating among local residents and on social media suggest that certain property owners are allegedly receiving preferential treatment, while others are facing immediate action.
Citizens have also raised questions about the role of certain officials of the Revenue Department, including patwaris, girdawars and tehsildars, alleging that administrative influence and personal recommendations may be affecting the operation.
They have called for scrutiny of the relevant officials’ previous postings, periods of service in particular areas and exercise of official authority to determine whether any irregularities or misuse of powers have occurred.
Particular concern has been expressed over the situation on both sides of Alpuri Main Bridge, where a market on one side has reportedly been demolished while questions have been raised about attempts to protect commercial structures on the opposite side.
Public, social and business circles have urged Governor Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Faisal Karim Kundi, the provincial authorities and Commissioner Malakand Division to take notice of the complaints and ensure an impartial inquiry.
They have proposed the formation of an independent investigative committee to examine official maps, property records, the legal status of demolished structures and those allegedly spared during the operation.
Citizens said they support the removal of illegal encroachments as an administrative necessity but stressed that the law must be applied equally to influential individuals and ordinary residents.
They maintained that an anti-encroachment campaign could retain public confidence only if it was conducted transparently, without discrimination or preferential treatment.
